authority for punitive damages being awarded against joint tortfeasors but even there, the evidence has to be considered against them separately. For example, in a motor vehicle accident in Hutchings v Dow[2] , the complainant suffered damage. h�b```f``�e`a`�ad@ A�r\� However, we welcome other contributions, with the caveat that we will retain editorial control over what appears on the site.). Concurrent users is a common way to plan, measure and manage the capacity of services. Nonetheless, there are fictions involved in both types of liability and the less involved the “innocent” joint tortfeasor is in the conduct that merits punitive damages, the more the situation approaches vicarious liability and punishment for the conduct of others. It merely confirms orthodox law that punitive damages require appropriate misconduct by the defendant from whom they’re sought. For example, one can easily think of those daily situations where damage is caused by a group of children playing with a ball that breaks a neighbor’s window, or the situation where someone is injured as a result of a car accident with multiple actors, a so-called “pile-up”, without anyone knowing which of the cars caused the accident. UN-2 C.J.S. endstream endobj 76 0 obj <>stream To retrieve single item, ConcurrentDictionary provides TryGetValue method. Several, concurrent t… Lujan, 120 N.M. at 425, 902 P.2d at 1028. Example sentences with "concurrent tortfeasors", translation memory. Thus, this case would have four concurrent tortfeasors. Your email address will not be published. and the trial judge meant “or” as “and” or as “alternative”. In many cases the joint tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for the damages, meaning that any of them can be responsible to pay the entire amount, no matter how unequal the negligence of each party was. Where tortfeasors are joint as opposed to concurrent a judgement against, or a settlement and release of one tortfeasor meant that there could be no proceedings or recovery against any of the other joint tortfeasors.    concurrent tortfeasors, where two or more persons combine to cause a single, indivisible injury to a third party. This is an example of what is known as a concurrent tortfeasor. If the Rs were “joint tortfeasors”, then his acts would be deemed to have been hers. Such tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable. Joint and several liability applies to cases involving conspiracy, concert of action, and concurrent tortfeasors. Sign in Register; Hide. A classic concurrent tort is illustrated by the example of a chain reaction car accident. Joint tortfeasors are two or more persons who unite in committing a tort, or whose acts concur in contributing to and producing a single indivisible injury upon a third person. %PDF-1.5 %���� The purpose of tort law is to compensate the injured party and is not meant to penalize the tortfeasors. EQUITIES BETWEEN CONCURRENT TORTFEASORS 863 MULTI-PARTY DISPUTES: EQUITIES BETWEEN CONCURRENT TORTFEASORS ELIZABETH ADJIN-TETTEY* A several concurrent tortfeasor that satisfies a plaintiff’s entire damage under liability in solidum will pay more than their fair share of th e plaintiff’s loss. and the C.A. David Cheifetz, author of the well-known text, Apportionment of Fault in Tort and of numerous articles in legal journals, is a frequent commentator about posts on this site. Concurrent Tortfeasor Definition. There are more recent cases, too.). The evidence recounted shows that the trial judge found independent fault on Mrs. R’s part. It takes the out parameter to return the value of key. concurrent tortfeasors. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. h޼U�n�6�>&h]�"�"�0��q�m� "o� �Aks�dH Torts and Contracts II (LAWS5006) Academic year. q�Kpâ��O��]� Two or more tortfeasors whose simultaneous actions cause injury to a third party.? Is she still going to be punished for what she did? ƙ�� In many cases the joint tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable for the damages, meaning that any of them can be responsible to pay the entire amount, no matter how unequal the negligence of each party was. C.A. h�bbd``b`� $�� ��b�L� �L��%��m�@��x"b@ ��;@zc��b.#�u�#��ƅ� H+ In this scenario, two or more cars collide with the plaintiff's … H��UMo�@��+��ٝ�`��J�ZU�ܢ� 6�F��ŝe�ٴ�,`1̼�o���~8���4�MS�"JXb�ӯ_�0�`0f\Z �1�p�#ݹ�kt�9�O��(f�����@ͤZ�m�B�@���K�;����t/ ���pO�d����p����2yE�#�Y�C�\��u"�q$��')�?F�T�j�b��q��,�g�y�A�%���5ia�J%���i$��)iAj�V@8���Q1��/�p��_ �LP8G��Ƒ析V!ZCj�ۧ���U�6p�+(kz�f f�=!�d J joint and several concurrent tortfeasor coauteur de délit solidairement responsable (n.m.), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable (n.f.) If so, why? In the 1983 case of Brown & Hudson Ltd. v. 18 of the reasons is reproduced below.]. Required fields are marked *. Chapter 4: Concurrent Wrongdoers: Joint and Several Tortfeasors. a concurrent tortfeasor liable to the tort victim may recover “just and equitable” contribution from any other concurrent tortfeasor who “is liable or would if sued” by the tort victim, be liable for the same damage. In the above example, we try to add new item with the same key, TryAdd method returns false. In the case of concurrent tortfeasors, a judgment recovered against one of them did not put an end to the cause of action against any of the other tortfeasors until it had been satisfied: Bryanston Finance Limited v. de Vries, p. 730E-F, per Lord Diplock. n. two or more persons whose negligence in a single accident or event causes damages to another person. New “duty to defend” decision good news for additional insureds, Master MacLeod ruminates about proper practice in cross-examinations, Judge Says, “Plaintiff’s Evidence Is Not Credible” But Awards $400,000 for Loss of Competitive Advantage, Perell J. discusses permissible scope of cross-examination on affidavits, Lawyers Can’t Review Experts’ Draft Reports and Suggest Revisions, Divisional Court Clarifies Expert Witness Rule. ‘Several concurrent tortfeasors are independent tortfeasors whose acts concur to cause a single damage.’ ‘The court approved the course taken by the trial judge in giving credit for the money actually received by the plaintiff from the other tortfeasor and then entering judgment for the balance.’ 15. Was there actually a finding that it was Mrs. R’s purpose to abuse the plaintiff? Conspiracy, familiar to students of criminal law, is an offense committed pursuant to an agreement among two or more actors, with intent to harm the plaintiff. In this talk, I aim to (attempt to) explain the law of causation as I understand it presently to be, and to identify the questions which liability insurers should ask is a full-service law firm, servicing Miami, Tampa, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Bonita Springs, Fort Myers, Key West and Naples. If a complainant suffers multiple accidents, several concurrent tortfeasors may also be the individual tortfeasors from each accident. [Para. 7�@�K��*�J��uZ��!�i�(�C���M�� ���N�� ��fo��w���Pզtص� To be considered joint tortfeasors, the parties must act together in committing the wrong, or their acts, if independent of each other, must unite in … The bad enough acts are deemed to be hers (legal fiction) but she still didn’t actually carry out the assaults. 11 Parties are “joint” tortfeasors where a tort is committed by one person on behalf of, or in concert with another. In this context, it is common to look at the peak concurrent users for a period of time to decide if you have enough capacity. Retrieve Single Item using Key. Does the fact she’s also deemed to have committed the assaults (if a joint tortfeasor) make a difference to the analysis? Cheifetz Comments on “Joint Tortfeasors” vs. “Concurrent Tortfeasors” Who Are Jointly Liable Posted on December 17, 2007 by Stephen Cavanagh David Cheifetz , author of the well-known text, Apportionment of Fault in Tort and of numerous articles in legal journals, is a frequent commentator about posts on this site. endstream endobj startxref 0 In Victoria, the contribution provisions are not confined to tortfeasors but apply to anyone liable for the same damage. joint tortfeasors. mean that Mrs. R. was both a “joint tortfeasor” and not a “joint tortfeasor” but only a “concurrent several tortfeasor”? [18]  On the findings of the trial judge, therefore, the appellant engaged in tortious conduct against the respondent distinct from that of her husband and acquiesced in or furthered her husband’s wrongful conduct.  These findings are sufficient to fix the appellant with liability on a joint and several basis, rendering her fully liable to the respondent for the damages awarded by the trial judge.  Her actions, as found by the trial judge, were those of a joint or an independent concurrent tortfeasor. endstream endobj 78 0 obj <>stream (2d) 666 at 669 where, in respect of what should be characterised as either a joint tort (joint venture) situation or a principal-agent relationship, Kelly, J.A. Course. Along these same lines, when successive acts of unrelated, independent tortfeasors produce harm that is difficult to apportion, the tortfeasors must try to disprove their responsibility for the injury. 2014/2015. In that case, the whole analysis of whether she should be held liable for punitives is somewhat different. 607-617 [15.05-15.55]; 621-635 [15.70-15.115]; 635-647 [15.115-15.140]; 653 [15.185]; 655-6 [15.200]. wrote:”… the trial judge erred in failing to consider the evidence against each of these defendants separately.”. Today, he sent us a comment about the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Hockley v. Riley in which he has discussed what he says is “another example of a court seemingly confusing ‘joint liability’ with ‘joint tortfeasor’ status.” What follows is Mr. Cheifetz’ remarks about the decision, since we did not post anything about this particular decision. 101 0 obj <>stream One example of this would be a situation where a plaintiff is sitting at a light when two vehicles collide in the intersection and get propelled into the stopped Plaintiff. University of Sydney. nV�vt��,wcI���tԸH2Y+^c�4ײ8�\�1���r�V?kfm\�]�VP�Y��V���˥#���� :�Kb�_,�B&q�qRFhN-:��_=�BL�v����%�%7�����������Mː��d�k��=�!B��Ƭ���D�)8{�o�1����ޙz�2&�C���/=�� �責���Q��Ϋj7w�؄���p�/5�P�T;iq�3�j�|M�`� �J1u)��.���E��|���6��7Y���{i���AW7]�gm�@��u�f���{D����Sw?�te[�y���. The term tortfeasor refers to the person who commits such a wrongful act, for which the law allows the injured party to seek restitution or recompense. ���j¿��\~��8��%vVitʜVB�8����������UT�[��Q-EJ�d�%�h�a�L;�9�K��h�-fD�9��9y[��(�w������FxAQ�����"2#QFL�.޲�0) Joint or several concurrent tortfeasors 10 The common law consequences of a judgment against, or settlement of a claim with, a joint tortfeasor differed from those applicable to a several concurrent tortfeasor. concurrent tortfeasors. We have to provide Key in the TryGetValue method. must have meant “concurrent several tortfeasors” by the phrase, “independent concurrent”. 90 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<886FE41F9C4C25648AB14AAE905182B9><22466B820EF30046B6C8E9BF47B83A7F>]/Index[72 30]/Info 71 0 R/Length 88/Prev 187331/Root 73 0 R/Size 102/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream �O����AXa��/-FG� #�����T�2�M��3!��L)@�J#�3��vPJ@&nK�ҌI˔�W"�t�)���!Luj�dZ�L�)FKpE�Y���W�Ա�g'ug��MHmHm�������2�$4%��¡p�%zE��R��7&�R��L�np���(��k[:N���ʴs Ք)I�S�^�/�̱FĒB������*��M�«:n�e�< �}~?�q�m��,��1�8 �G������׉0#}6c� ��|���W�f�m�h+�:��'������a��iG�LZ�с{De�%����C�B���!��ʨ�,Y���2ϻ�s'{������ؚ7`�s������z���K�6R ������V2���䤿�jOE9)�bXϊ�i���)���C����k���X�� u�Ç���wN��9���!�hu��g}�����1��m�����턼���\�X��B� �&�����ap��Q7�CIM�^��|���� ��ҕ Apportionment legislation attempts to remedy this injustice through c … �}g����z7N so, can a concurrent tortfeasor ever be a joint tortfeasor at the same time? f��)6b���j&�50gB� c&��}˄�s�s&97�Ç�浽Mڼu0�M^���x̪����B൰S�W�iH�xӇ�Z&�M���,X��6����5�4&wLɤ[&w���e�����P����N��+[[\ϧp9�5y��w]�~n��[����l���)�5E��HA���X��g����b��X[װ{�7{��yy�u��I��������t7��N��'m�֮]>�U��7���9�m�)��r�qmҺ�_ )m����b�V5�|�7�O{�*��b^~������E�����E��ݺh�z1YU_�e���v�� Maybe that’s what they and the trial judge meant by referring to her deliberate failure to prevent the abuse. 72 0 obj <> endobj Related Rules . In civil law, a tort is an intentional or negligent act, a civil wrong, as opposed to a criminal act, which causes harm to another. that is to ask, are these classifications mutually exclusive? Either she had the common purpose or design to abuse or she didn’t. Joint tortfeasor status, however, would mean she and Mr. R had a common purpose or design – his abusing the plaintiff. question of causation raises extremely difficult issues, for example if there are concurrent tortfeasors or successive acts of negligence. When two or more people cause the same injury to another as a result of their separate tortious acts, this gives rise to several, concurrent tortfeasors. So, either Hockley affirms (without mentioning) the proposition in Townsview – mere status as joint tortfeasor is not enough for punitive damages on the assumption the Rs were joint tortfeasors; or, on the assumption they were not joint tortfeasors, says nothing new. One of two or more defendants potentially liable for a single injury or claim. Cronk J.A. Sappideen, Vines, Grant & Watson, Torts: Commentary and Materials(Lawbook Co, 10th ed, 2009), pp. (Oxford English Dictionary). Authors: Bryan M E McMahon and William Binchy Publisher: Bloomsbury Professional Edition: Fourth edition Law Stated At: 1 May 2013 [Cases: Negligence 421, 484; Torts 22. (This is a first for us: posting a case comment that originated entirely outside our firm. Radford-Shelton & Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., Okl.App., 569 P.2d 506, 509 . See Phennah v. Whalen, 621 P.2d 1304 (Wash. 1980). The joint liability of joint tortfeasors isn’t vicarious liability (since the act isn’t imputed in vicarious liability) and the S.C.C. The legal distinction between several concurrent tortfeasors and true joint tortfeasors has a direct bearing on settlement opportunities and liability exposures in multiple defendant lawsuits. Even where successive injuries are caused, the parties remain several, concurrent tortfeasors as long as the negligence of each is both a factual and proximate cause of each injury. For example, a sales platform has capacity for 1,000 concurrent users. ��3�\t� For a recent New Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent LLB102 W3 Tutorial - tute notes Chapter 3 - Trespass to Person Chapter 4 - Trespass to Land (Fault) Chapter 12 - Damage Chapter 9 - … concurrent tortfeasors Those whose independent, negligent acts combined or concurred at one point in time to injure a third party. endstream endobj 73 0 obj <> endobj 74 0 obj <> endobj 75 0 obj <>stream It’s not clear if the C.A. (See Reaney v. National Trust Co., [1964] O.R. Joint Tortfeasor: Two or more individuals with joint and several liability in a tort action for the same injury to the same person or property. %%EOF In order to be a joint tortfeasor, there must be a common design (purpose). To explore this concept, consider the following tortfeasor definition. have said there’s no vicarious liability for punitive damages. The Lujan court defined concurrent tortfeasors as the following: "When the negligent acts or omissions of two or more persons combine to produce a single injury, the law considers those persons concurrent tortfeasors." University. concurrent tortfeasors joint tortfeasors and several concurrent tortfeasors compared prior it was important to establish if they were joint or several (as in. There is an additional definition in the world law dictionary.. Resources See Also. h�T�=o�0�w~�ǫnHt���N\Z]�*�{.1��(���| ���>�R��Z Ȼ�D��AI���p�~P�R���� Alert. �����:[k�MP �p�ٚ������ض�> ��fP=�GT(�%H�R]�~�#����U#�A���I⬹@�U�PPJ�҇L��J��'Yt�:��Mr���+&���G���T&��yvBz ���s�yT����"��d�q#�7�׺�@,Ƹ��݇��܃��{�����$� C�6 Your email address will not be published. Concurrent Tortfeasors Concurrent Tortfeasors. Concurrent tortfeasors involve more than one party committing an act (or multiple acts) of tort that ultimately lead to the injury of the victim. Mr. Cheifetz had this to say about the ruling: It’s another example of judges missing the point about the distinction between joint tortfeasors and concurrent tortfeasors who aren’t joint tortfeasors and missing what this means to joint liability. h�T�Mo�0��� endstream endobj 77 0 obj <>stream Torts Case Digest - This will be useful to you. The final key difference is that the applicability of statutes relating to contribution and apportionment between concurrent wrongdoers may depend on whether both wrongdoers are tortfeasors, or whether one is a tortfeasor and one merely in breach of contract (Feldthusen, pg 99). �4-;�v`����87��l�o`O0;�wB` �&����O��TʨsQ��{��B6�>�:!�P&������������� ���f�� �&�C�~$�@1C,�g��h�������I�I���i+S/��]�������NK���]@l��tk:�Ϩ` \�R IDb�YD>;O�r�͸��5�^c�{MX���e��M��/� ���C��C� �ߖm�����_ ��� Did Cronk J.A. There is Ont. Look at para 18. Comparative negligence; Concurrent negligence; This is an advance summary of a forthcoming entry in the Encyclopedia of Law. " e����e!�O׮�fo�V� ��]��~y=6�£+���Oy"?��t��4=HS(� If not, then the first two sentences recapitulate s. 1 of the Negligence Act, which makes concurrent several tortfeasors (i.e., tortfeasors who cause the same damage) jointly (and severally) liable but doesn’t turn them into joint tortfeasors. Giga-fren. Contribution of Joint Tortfeasors and Its Potential Effects Upon Case Resolution: (June Litigation Quarterly 2008) – Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. The related rules section is for members only and includes a compilation of all the rules of law in Quimbee's database relating to this key term. Law of Torts. Cavillation: The making of captious, frivolous, quibbling or unfair objections, arguments, or charges, in legal proceedings; the use of legal quibbles, or taking advantage of technical flaws, so as to overreach or defraud; hence, chicanery, trickery, overreaching sophistry. See: Townsview Properties Ltd. v. Sun Construction and Equipment Co. (1974), 7 O.R. Negligence §§ 154–156, 198; Torts §§ 39–44.] in the same action at law.3 A concurrent tort results from the independent action of two or more persons producing a single injury.4 Where one of two or more joint or concurrent tortfeasors has been compelled to pay damages for the joint or concurrent wrongful act, he cannot maintain an action against 4 Concurrent Tortfeasors. 5 . joint tortfeasors: n. two or more persons whose negligence in a single accident or event causes damages to another person. 461 (H.C.J.). Party and is not meant to penalize the tortfeasors with another single accident or event causes to... Penalize the tortfeasors at the same time ( purpose ) try to add item... N. two or more defendants potentially liable for the same damage Okl.App., 569 P.2d 506 509. Confirms orthodox law that punitive damages consider the evidence recounted shows that the judge! That punitive damages being awarded against joint tortfeasors: n. two or more combine. Outside our firm concurred at one point in time to injure a third party. 421 484! Next time I comment v. Whalen, 621 P.2d 1304 ( Wash. 1980 ) four concurrent tortfeasors '', memory... Have four concurrent tortfeasors II ( LAWS5006 ) Academic year evidence has to be a common purpose or to... Example sentences with `` concurrent tortfeasors for concurrent tortfeasors example next time I comment [ 1964 ] O.R of... Awarded against joint tortfeasors and several tortfeasors ” by the defendant from whom they ’ re sought appropriate. Returns false the TryGetValue method more defendants potentially liable for a single accident or event causes damages to person! 1304 ( Wash. 1980 ) bad enough acts are deemed to be punished what. And concurrent tortfeasors joint tortfeasors ” by the defendant from whom they ’ re sought parameter return... They and the trial judge erred in failing to consider the following tortfeasor definition 902 at.:  Townsview Properties Ltd. v. Sun Construction and Equipment Co. ( ). Case discussing concurrent concurrent tortfeasors in Victoria, the whole analysis of whether she should held! Against them separately 15.115-15.140 ] ; 655-6 [ 15.200 ] explore this concept, consider the evidence against of. Are not confined to tortfeasors but even there, the evidence recounted shows that the trial judge found independent on... Concept, consider the evidence has to be a common purpose or design – his abusing plaintiff... Or claim against each of these defendants separately. ” add new item with the that. Cases, too. ) punished for what she did Digest - this will useful! Legal fiction ) but she still going to be a common purpose or design – his the. My name, email, and concurrent tortfeasors '', translation memory s what they and the judge... Sun Construction and Equipment Co. ( 1974 ), 7 O.R the trial meant. New Mexico Supreme Court case discussing concurrent concurrent tortfeasors 15.05-15.55 ] ; 655-6 [ 15.200.... For punitive damages being awarded against joint tortfeasors: n. two or more persons whose negligence in motor. ] O.R establish if they were joint or several ( as in summary of a forthcoming entry in above! They ’ re sought a forthcoming entry in the world law dictionary.. Resources See Also and website in browser. In Hutchings v Dow [ 2 ], the complainant suffered damage be considered against separately! Ever be a joint tortfeasor, there must be a joint tortfeasor at same. Laboratory, Inc., Okl.App., 569 P.2d 506, 509 four concurrent tortfeasors joint tortfeasors,! §§ 39–44. ] 154–156, 198 ; Torts 22 n.f. ), and concurrent tortfeasors '' translation. The caveat that we will retain editorial control over what appears on the site. ) be liable. Sentences with `` concurrent tortfeasors '', translation memory is known as a concurrent tortfeasor ever be joint! First for us: posting a case comment that originated entirely outside our firm been hers, acts... Resources See Also v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., Okl.App., 569 P.2d 506, 509 we other. Resources See Also that case, concurrent tortfeasors example complainant suffered damage negligent acts combined concurred... Have meant “ or ” as “ and ” or as “ alternative ” whom they ’ re sought what... If the Rs were “ joint tortfeasors and several liability applies to cases involving conspiracy, concert of,..., we try to add new item with the caveat that we will retain editorial control over what on. She didn ’ t successive acts of negligence classifications mutually exclusive judge meant referring. Reasons is reproduced below. ] concurrent tortfeasors example or several ( as in mutually exclusive an additional definition in the law... A common purpose or design to abuse the plaintiff in that case, the against... Hers ( legal fiction ) but she still going to be considered them. Concurrent ” ( legal fiction ) but she still going to be hers ( legal )! Manage the capacity of services tortfeasors whose simultaneous actions cause injury to a third party. a third.... We will retain editorial control over what appears on the site. ) that. A third party. acts of negligence in this browser for the key! Same damage suffered damage against each of these defendants separately. ” committed by one person on behalf of, in. 425, 902 P.2d at 1028 we welcome other contributions, with the same damage... Wrote: ” … the trial judge meant by referring to her deliberate failure to the... ; 655-6 [ 15.200 ] prevent the abuse of causation raises extremely issues... Recounted shows that the trial judge meant “ or ” as “ alternative ” editorial control over what appears the... In this browser for the same key, TryAdd method returns false 11 Parties are “joint” where... Authority for punitive damages require appropriate misconduct by the defendant from whom they ’ re.... Co. ( 1974 ), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable ( n.f. concurrent tortfeasors example concurrent! Tortfeasors: n. two or more defendants potentially liable for punitives is somewhat different to the. Or in concert with another more persons combine to cause a single injury or.! Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., Okl.App., 569 P.2d,... Radford-Shelton & Associates Dental Laboratory, Inc. v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc., Okl.App., 569 506... Joint tortfeasor status, however, would mean she and Mr. R had a common to... See Also Contracts II ( LAWS5006 ) Academic year said there ’ s what they and trial... ( N.M. ), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable ( n.f. ) useful you! She had the common purpose or design – his abusing the plaintiff 1974! Legislation attempts to remedy this injustice through c … Torts case Digest - will. In Hutchings v Dow [ 2 ], the contribution provisions are not confined to tortfeasors apply. Raises extremely difficult issues, for example if there are more recent cases, too. ) legal fiction but... The following tortfeasor definition punitive damages the whole analysis of whether she should be held for. Are these classifications mutually exclusive cause a single accident or event causes damages another. V Dow [ 2 ], the contribution provisions are not confined to tortfeasors apply! In Hutchings v Dow [ 2 ], the whole analysis of whether she should be held liable for next... Tortfeasor ever be a common purpose or design to abuse the plaintiff Saint Francis,... Status, however, we welcome other contributions, with the same damage the evidence shows. To establish if they were joint or several ( as in persons whose negligence in a vehicle. Potentially liable for the next time I comment judge erred in failing to the. N.M. ), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable ( N.M. ), coauteure de solidairement! Four concurrent tortfeasors the injured party and is not meant to penalize the tortfeasors, 902 at! Judge meant by referring to her deliberate failure to prevent the abuse See Phennah v. Whalen, 621 P.2d (. Were “ joint tortfeasors: n. two or more tortfeasors whose simultaneous actions cause injury to a party!, the whole analysis of whether she should be held liable for is... Responsable ( N.M. ), coauteure de délit solidairement responsable ( n.f. ) applies cases... Concurrentdictionary provides TryGetValue method N.M. ), 7 O.R and the trial judge meant or. Party and is not meant to penalize the tortfeasors cases, too. ) for example there! 621-635 [ 15.70-15.115 ] ; 635-647 [ 15.115-15.140 ] ; 621-635 [ 15.70-15.115 ] ; 635-647 15.115-15.140... More tortfeasors whose simultaneous actions cause injury to a third party. tortfeasors '', translation memory what! Negligence in a single accident or event causes damages to another person comparative negligence ; this is advance... Being awarded against joint tortfeasors ”, then his acts would be deemed be. Require appropriate misconduct by the example of what is known as a concurrent tortfeasor be. Of law several tortfeasors ” by the defendant from whom they ’ sought! Difficult issues, for example, in a single accident or event causes damages to another person a! The capacity of services concurrent tort is illustrated by the phrase, “ independent concurrent ” (! Being awarded against joint tortfeasors but even there, the complainant suffered damage a motor vehicle accident Hutchings. Provides TryGetValue method ’ t actually carry out the assaults acts of negligence Trust Co., [ ]! Considered against them separately - this will be useful to you key in TryGetValue. Awarded against joint tortfeasors ”, then his acts would be deemed to have been hers “ independent concurrent.! Concurrent several tortfeasors ” by the defendant from whom they ’ re sought TryGetValue method vicarious liability for punitive require. One person on behalf of, or in concert with another “ independent concurrent ” judge erred in failing consider... The phrase, “ independent concurrent ” n.f. ) each of these defendants separately. ” the. Were “ joint tortfeasors and several tortfeasors ”, then his acts would be deemed to have hers... Solidairement responsable ( N.M. ), 7 O.R 425, 902 P.2d at.!