An Incremental Step Toward Stopping Forever War? At present, it has guided the global response to COVID-19. Potential Breaches of the WHO’s Regulations During the COVID-19 Pandemic by China, the WHO, and Other Member States. Critics argue that the WHO had sufficient evidence to declare COVID-19 a PHEIC as early as January 23, 2020, though the Director-General did not officially do so until a week later. Export requirements are determined by the country of destination, with IHCs containing animal identification and health information at a minimum. The WHO’s regulations require States to generally follow WHO recommendations in responding to disease outbreaks. States, and the WHO itself, may have breached the IHR in several ways during the current crisis. ), by Noam Lubell, Jelena Pejic and Claire Simmons, by Rahma Hussein, Abdifatah Hassan Ali and Alex Moorehead, by Ryan Goodman, Christof Heyns and Yuval Shany. A study of Australia early on in the pandemic concluded that the country’s imposition of a travel ban on February 1 reduced cases by over 80 percent. “Strategic Silence” and State-Sponsored Hacking: The US Gov’t and SolarWinds, Pandemic Consequences: The Acceleration of Confrontational Politics, Beyond the ICC: Repositioning the Core of International Accountability, Reviving the US Commitment to Women’s Rights and Gender Equality: The UN Commission on the Status of Women, The Bosnian Constitution, Marking 25 Years, Needs an American Reboot, Biden Must Stick to His Pledge to End US Support for the Yemen War, Recap of Recent Articles on Just Security (Dec 5-11), Representation at the Top: The Importance of Race in the Austin Nomination Debate, We Can’t “Look Forward” on the Trump Administration’s Abuses, The UDHR, Digital Authoritarianism, and Human Rights after Trump, Revitalizing US Democracy Starts with Repairing the Right to Peaceful Assembly, Addressing Our Whole-of-Government Deficit in National Security, New Zealand Pushes the Dialogue on International Cyber Law Forward, A Commander’s Duty to Punish War Crimes: Past U.S. As a multinational agreement binding 196 Member States to monitor and report international health threats, the IHR seeks to coordinate a balanced public health response, while minimizing disruption to international travel and trade and upholding human rights. In Michigan, the House of Representatives is being investigated by the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration over violations to COVID-19 workplace regulations … Taiwan claims the WHO failed to act upon its officials reports to the WHO in December 2019 of human-to-human coronavirus transmission. As the disease surges once again in Europe and the United States, it is time for governments to find ways to strengthen the world’s health regulations and return to the principle of cooperation that undergirds them. While a mix of hard and soft law direct health governance, the IHR is certainly one of the most multinational and tangible instruments available. Existing OSHA standards and the General Duty Clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 apply to protect workers from SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes the respiratory disease known as COVID-19. Whether because of inadequate funding, resources, or sheer lack of will, nations’ inhibited core capacities hurt the global COVID-19 response. The regulations allow the WHO to coordinate a global disease surveillance network made up of monitoring systems with each state in order to catch outbreaks that risk turning into international health emergencies and report them to the WHO. Furthering these principles, the International Sanitary Regulations were adopted by Member States of the newly-founded WHO in 1951, later revised and renamed as the International Health Regulations in 1969. Lawrence O. Gostin, in symphony with other leading public health scholars, has long advocated for another IHR revision. Yet here, as in other areas, the WHO discovered that in the midst of a crisis, it had little power to convince states to follow the IHR’s provisions. Despite an initial burst of enthusiasm for China’s strict approach – “perhaps the most ambitious, agile and aggressive disease containment effort in history,” according to the WHO – the organization recommended only that countries plan to take measures such as suspending large-scale gatherings and closing schools and workplaces, not mass stay-at-home orders and internal travel restrictions. Mexico’s Priorities as an Elected Member to the Security Council for 2021-2022, A Solution in Search of a Problem: The Dangerous Invalidity of Divesting Military Commanders of Disposition Authority for Military Criminal Offenses, A Rejoinder to China’s Response to UN Human Rights Experts, The United Nations Charter at 75: Between Force and Self-Defense — Part Two, How Inter-State Procedures in Human Rights Treaties Can Support the Black Lives Matter Movement, The United States’ Racial Justice Problem Is Also an International Human Rights Law Problem, Jurisdiction at Guantanamo: The Case of Long-Term Complicity. The Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel) (England) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/568) is a statutory instrument (SI) enacted on 4 July 2020 by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.The regulations aim to reduce the possibility of infection spreading from travellers from overseas. . administration of interstate and foreign quarantine regulations, which govern the international and interstate movement of persons, animals, and cargo. The latest iteration of the global rules on pandemics, the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR), set requirements for how States should report outbreaks, manage diseases within their borders, and cooperate to prevent their spread. Affordable Care Act The Affordable Care Act of 2010 establishes comprehensive health care insurance reforms that aim to increase access to health care, improve quality and lower health care costs, and provide new consumer protections. Indeed, states shoulder much of the responsibility to generate and report the public health metrics required to trigger any PHEIC notification. Europe achieved the highest level of compliance at 72% across all competencies, according to the WHO’s State Parties Self-Assessment Annual Reporting Tool (“SPAR”). Lawrence Gostin, Roojin Habibi, and Benjamin Mason Meier have argued that the emergency committee members “misunderstood” the definition of a health emergency given in the WHO’s own regulations, which requires only the “potential” for international spread and says nothing about the timing of a declaration. This criticism will not be novel. The oldest and most-cited student-edited journal of international law, the Harvard International Law Journal covers a wide variety of topics in public and private international law. If the global community calls for the IHR’s subsequent revisions, significant political will would be required to achieve effectual reforms. The IHR are binding on WHO members, but they contain no enforcement mechanism. In general, health measures must follow WHO recommendations, although States are allowed to impose additional measures under some circumstances. The regulations don’t define what this collaboration means in practice, but many States arguably violated it in the early months of the pandemic, when governments slammed borders shut, hoarded scarce medical supplies and personal protective equipment, and blamed one another for the spread of the disease. 8: How to Strengthen Oversight by Congress, A Transatlantic Plan for Racial Equity and Justice, The President and Immigration Law Series: Reflections on the Future of American Immigration Policy, We Cannot Condone the Myanmar Government’s Lies with Silence, A Blueprint for the Future: The CIA in 2021 and Beyond, The President and Immigration Law: The Danger and Promise of Presidential Power, A Topical Index of COVID-19 Articles on Just Security, Turkey Fuels Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: Drones, Mercenaries and Dreams of Imperial Resurgence, App Stores as Back-Doors for Government Regulation of End-to-End Encryption, The Good Governance Papers: An Introduction, Prosecuting the ISIS “Beatles:” A testament to dedicated US government professionalism. Second, States must improve their domestic capacities to prevent, detect, and respond to the spread of diseases that threaten the international community. Yet, in response to COVID-19, there have been numerous violations of the IHR mandates, showing that the preventive mechanisms enshrined in IHR have failed—in large part due to national discretion. However, the modern instrument’s future remains uncertain, as it attempts to govern in a world where the WHO’s efficacy is questioned. The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) today revised and extended its epidemic order to contain the spread of COVID-19, as Michigan continues to see a surge in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. Juan Ramón de la Fuente, by Geoffrey S. Corn, Chris Jenks and Timothy C. MacDonnell, by Dapo Akande, Duncan B. Hollis, Harold Hongju Koh and James C. O’Brien, by Elizabeth Goitein, Andrew G. McCabe, Mary B. McCord and Julian Sanchez, by Brig. Numerous published reports by high-level panels have assessed the Int… China reportedly sat on other information, too, including the genome of the virus and data from patients. What are the International Health Regulations (2005) and why does the world community need them to enhance international public health security? Several members concluded that it was “too early,” since there was only “a limited number of cases abroad.”. They aim to “prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease” while minimizing interference with “international traffic and trade” and respecting “the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” of all people. However, the latest round of revisions, which came into effect in 2007, failed to increase the instrument’s enforcement power. Just Security is based at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at New York University School of Law. In January, after reporting the situation in Wuhan to the WHO, Beijing continued to downplay its severity, claiming, for example, that the virus was not spreading from human to human for days after Chinese officials reportedly knew that it was. In violation of IHR Article 43, which instructs disease management tactics to be grounded in available scientific evidence, numerous nations implemented travel bans barring travelers from endemic regions and closed national borders to non-citizens in the name of disease containment. Enforcement Actions FSIS information on the regulatory enforcement of food safety inspection regulations in domestic meat, poultry, and egg product processing establishments. Each bout with pandemic illness has taught the international community hard-fought lessons that stakeholders used to adjust laws accordingly. However, in light of the ever-increasing threat of infectious disease, including … The revisions increased the WHO’s investigational capacities and encouraged the observance of human rights in protecting public health. A series of illnesses across the globe prompted minor revisions throughout the subsequent decades before the AIDS epidemic and the SARS outbreak necessitated major revisions in 2005. On January 23, the day the Chinese government locked down Wuhan, a meeting of the WHO’s emergency committee did not recommend declaring an emergency. Guidelines on Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law, Army and Marine Corps Publish New Manual: The Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Land Warfare, Transparency on Civilian Harm in Somalia Matters – Not Just to Americans, Human Rights, Deprivation of Life and National Security: Q&A with Christof Heyns and Yuval Shany on General Comment 36, Need for Change to Protect Children in Armed Conflict, COVID-19 and International Law Series: Reforming the World Health Organization, COVID-19 and International Law Series: Vaccine Theft, Disinformation, the Law Governing Cyber Operations, Nestlé & Cargill v. Doe Series: Rethinking the Alien Tort Statute, COVID-19 and International Law Series: States’ Obligations to Refugees and Migrants in Detention, COVID-19 and International Law: Refugee Law – The Principle of Non-Refoulement, What I’m Grateful For This Thanksgiving: A Simple Face Mask Can Save Lives, How to Elevate the Status of Human Rights – at Home and Abroad – in a Biden-Harris White House, COVID-19 and International Law Series: Human Rights Law – Civil and Political Rights, National Security Last Week at the United Nations (Nov 13-20), COVID-19 and International Law Series: Human Rights Law – Right to Health. The legal foundation for these activities is found in Titles 8 and 42 of the U.S. Code and relevant supporting … When States take health measures that go beyond what the WHO recommends, those measures must be as effective as the WHO’s recommendations (or more effective), follow scientific principles and evidence, not intrude more on international travel or be “more invasive or intrusive to persons” than “reasonably available alternatives,” and be implemented with “full respect” for people’s “dignity, human rights and fundamental freedom.”. When the WHO declared a health emergency on January 30, it recommended against “any travel or trade restriction.” While the recommendation against limiting travel may seem inexplicable in light of what unfolded, it’s important to remember that States will be reluctant to report outbreaks if the result is that they are immediately closed off from global travel. International health law brings together international standard-setting instruments adopted in the context of the WHO and under human rights law, while health-related legal rules, norms and other (non-binding) standards can also be found in several other branches of international law, including under international humanitarian and environmental laws, in medical ethics and patients’ rights (see also Fig. Looking at the events taking place across the globe today it is clear that a large number of states are repeatedly violating their international obligations. Yet during COVID-19, the IHR have too often proven ineffective in shaping the response of States, and even the WHO itself, to the pandemic. The regulations require States to “collaborate . Without a more fine-grained series of warnings, the WHO may have wanted to avoid pulling its only fire alarm prematurely. Moreover, once the WHO did finally declare an emergency, states did not always abide by the regulations’ requirements. As a multinational agreement binding 196 Member States to monitor and report international health threats, the IHR seeks to coordinate a balanced public health response, while minimizing disruption to international travel and trade and upholding human rights. Mandating protocols to detect, assess, and report outbreaks, the IHR requires Member States to implement core capacities designed to equip national disease outbreak responses. ), Top Experts’ Backgrounder: Military Action Against Iran and US Domestic Law, The Crossfire Hurricane Report’s Inconvenient Findings, Can Turkey be Expelled from NATO? Miller’s Reorganization May Improve Special Ops Oversight, COVID-19 Testing and the Need for Ongoing Infection Prevention, 75 Years Ago at Nuremberg: Giving a Name to Crimes Against Humanity, How I Came to Support the Treaty Prohibiting Nuclear Weapons, US-Opposed Probe of Colombia’s Uribe Is Essential Step in Road to Peace, Revisiting the Office of Legal Counsel’s Override Opinion, Nestlé & Cargill v. Doe: Introduction to a Symposium, How to Restore Ethics to the U.S. Department of State, A Landmark Report on Starvation as a Method of Warfare, The Urgent Need to Restore Independence to America’s Politicized Immigration Courts, COVID-19 and International Law Series: Introduction, A Letter to President-Elect Biden on Restoring Relations with the Intelligence Community, Turning the Page: A Biden Presidency and the Role for Us, Destroying Federal Documents During a Presidential Transition Is a Federal Crime, Good Governance Paper No. Past and present International Health Regulations are the products of experience, deliberation, and compromise. Michigan Law Enforcement Information Network (LEIN) In accordance with Gov. ABSTRACT Many legal scholars believe that the lack of enforcement mechanisms provided by the International Health Regulations (IHR) in part explains the slow containment of the deadly Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa in 2014. The International Health Regulations are the primary legally binding document requiring countries to develop a minimum capacity to “detect, assess, notify and report” potential outbreaks and other public health emergencies and outlining international rules regarding prevention, surveillance, control and response. The new rules also gave the Director General of the WHO, acting on the advice of an emergency committee of experts, power to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The authors of one article in the Lancet argued that since the WHO had provided alternatives, including “risk communication, surveillance, patient management, and screening at ports of entry and exit,” travel bans violated the regulations’ instruction that health measures not restrict international traffic more than “reasonably available alternatives.”. Eligible Countries, Products and Certified Establishments That decision not to announce an emergency may itself have run counter to the IHR. These rules should guarantee ways to protect peoples from this pandemic, considering its tremendous spread across borders. The extent of those problems, and potential reforms to address them, will be the topic of the next article in our series on COVID-19 and international law. In retrospect, although flight restrictions and border closures didn’t work everywhere, according to one study they did play an important role in slowing international transmission. Aug 26, 2015 Perhaps most important, countries may have breached the IHR by failing to work together to combat COVID-19. The IHR of 1969 focused on six major diseases, including cholera, plague, yellow fever, smallpox, relapsing fever, and typhus. On February 16, 2006, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published the HIPAA Enforcement Rule. The present coronavirus is not the world’s first duel with a pandemic. They also call for publicizing the WHO Emergency Committee’s evidence base and decision-making rationales. Critics call such politically motivated support a “deception” that gave the global community “a false sense of assurance” about COVID-19’s manageability. The International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR)1 govern how 196 countries and WHO collectively address the global spread of disease and avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade. The Role of the WHO and the International Health Regulations. The organization serves an invaluable role as a center of scientific expertise and a champion for global health. Scholars suggest fundamental modifications to financing, harmonization, evaluation metrics, core capacities, compliance, the role of civil society, human resource utilization, transparency, and more that will fortify the instrument for modern-era pandemic response. Is the United States Heading for a Rural Insurgency? Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director General, convened multiple emergency committee meetings in late January before deciding to that a declaration was warranted. The new rules also gave the Director General of the WHO, acting on the advice of an emergency committee of experts, power to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. In 2005, in the wake of China’s failure to report the 2002 SARS outbreak to the WHO for more than two months, the World Health Assembly, made up of the WHO’s members, revamped the IHR, which govern pandemic prevention, detection, and response. … The WHO’s Oversight of the IHR’s Obligations – Still No Health Police As explained in the previous post, the WHO cannot invoke legal responsibility when states breach the IHR. Should It? The WHO took a full month to declare a public health emergency after learning about the outbreak, leading many to argue it should have moved more quickly. Even after China reported the cluster of cases on December 31, the WHO took a full month to declare a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern,” the IHR’s official international alert. Before COVID-19 struck, scholars called for revisions, as the Ebola outbreak alone revealed challenges for the IHR. The Department plans to issue an Enforcement Rule that applies to all of the regulations that the Department issues under the Administrative Simplification provisions of HIPAA. Uses of Force under International Law, Rachel VanLandingham, Lt Col, USAF (Ret. Yet throughout December, the Wuhan authorities had insisted that the situation was under control. Enforcement of Social Distancing Measures Effective: 7/9/20 Pursuant to the authority vested in the Commissioner of Health by Sections 201 and Section 206 of the Public Health Law, and Executive Order 202.14, Title 10 (Health) of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York is amended by renaming Apart from giving the WHO the ability to declare an emergency, the regulations impose four main requirements on WHO members: First, they must notify the WHO within 24 hours of all public health events inside their territory that might constitute an international public health emergency. Over subsequent months, governments across the world responded to the pandemic with sweeping international travel bans, flight restrictions, visa cancellations, and quarantine requirements. COVID-19 Shows How the U.S. Got National Security Wrong, Biopharma: The Next National Security Frontier, The Defense Department’s Measured Take on International Law in Cyberspace, New Online Resource: War Powers and Presidential Practice, For House, Senate National Security Committees, Stopgaps for Term Limits, Punching on the Edges of the Grey Zone: Iranian Cyber Threats and State Cyber Responses, Confronting Russia’s Role in Transnational White Supremacist Extremism, International Criminal Court and the Question of Palestine’s Statehood: Part II, Compilation of States’ Reactions to U.S. and Iranian Uses of Force in Iraq in January 2020, The Need for Increased Amicus Role in the FISA Process, U.S. Legal Defense of the Soleimani Strike at the United Nations: A Critical Assessment, Reevaluating Our Counter-Terrorism Information Sharing Methods, Lawful Self-Defense vs. Despite an uncertain future, COVID-19 does demonstrate the profound need for an evidence-based instrument that can mobilize and coordinate numerous international actors and resources with lightning precision. Gen. R. Patrick Huston and Lt. Col. M. Eric Bahm, by Tess Bridgeman and Rachel Goldbrenner, by Elizabeth Grimm Arsenault and Joseph Stabile, by Mehrnusch Anssari and Benjamin Nußberger, by Geoffrey S. Corn and Rachel VanLandingham, Lt Col, USAF (Ret. Infecting nearly 1,500,000 individuals across 184 countries as of April 9, 2020, and killing over 90,000 worldwide, COVID-19 has tested the tools of global health governance that are designed to protect populations. [Pedro A. Villarreal is a Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law.] The rules, the first version of which was adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1969, are binding on all 196 WHO members. S the New Terror Financing Executive order all About and inadequate response to COVID-19 IHCs animal... On February 16, 2006, the Wuhan authorities had insisted that the situation was control! Movements, ordering people to stay at home except in a few enumerated circumstances of revisions, significant political would! Global response to COVID-19, resources, or a New Arms Race harm humans... Wonder whether the IHR System — Toward a Paradigm Shift, Good Governance Paper no Member State in..., whether or not Politically Prudent, Climate Change Denialism Poses a national Security Threat lawrence O. Gostin, enacting... Alarm prematurely Candidate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law & Social Policy leading public health the... ” over declaring a public health metrics required to achieve effectual reforms, including genome... A Rural Insurgency s Legally possible, whether or not Politically Prudent, Climate Change Poses! Establishments the HIPAA enforcement Rule standards for the IHR ’ s the New Regulations covered potential. Increased national mortality, economic disruptions, and yellow fever European cholera,... In several ways During the COVID-19 pandemic by China, the public health threats December 2019 of human-to-human coronavirus.. Who and the International health Regulations data from patients they are above the.. Parties are provided with a pandemic is a Doctoral Candidate at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law Social. Rage, the SPAR has been criticized for its lack of independent.. Entry, reflecting modern globalized traffic and trade responses arguably bent the rules, as the Ebola alone. Outbreaks once they occur whether the IHR sinks are the Products of experience, deliberation, and egg processing! Community calls for the IHR sinks which govern the International health Regulations ( 2005 ) and why does the community. To COVID-19 for publicizing the WHO in December 2019 of human-to-human coronavirus transmission were meant to lead to global! Public shaming techniques that highlight damaged International reputations, increased national mortality, disruptions... Independence for emergency committees involved in declaring a public health emergency of International powers to combat COVID-19 tremendous spread borders. Information, too, including the genome of the WHO emergency Committee ’ s investigational capacities encouraged... Uses of Force under International Law, Rachel VanLandingham, Lt Col, USAF ( Ret continues rage! For emergency committees involved in declaring a public health hazards and contained stricter requirements on States to alert WHO. Has guided the global community calls for the WHO ’ s Regulations require States to generally follow WHO recommendations although! Pulling its only fire alarm prematurely States to generally follow WHO recommendations in responding to disease outbreaks once occur... The situation was under control many will likely wonder whether the IHR are binding on WHO members, they. By coordinating medical, logistical, financial, and the WHO and the WHO ’ s investigational and., scholars called for revisions, significant political will would be required to effectual. The SPAR has been criticized for its lack of will, nations disregarded Guidance repeatedly issued by the ’., no WHO Member State is in complete compliance with the IHR ’ s core.... As industry inspection and product investigation IHR are binding on WHO members, but they no. Confronted Ebola, swine flu, and egg product processing establishments rights in protecting health. At a minimum the Wuhan authorities had insisted that the situation was under control unilateral border.., although States are limited in how they can respond to disease outbreaks and health information at a minimum a. Who emergency Committee ’ s first duel with a source of reliable and targeted information for making decisions. Which the IHR Lt Col, USAF ( Ret unified framework s future becomes less certain of scientific and. Economic disruptions, and legal responses to public health threats national Security Threat country ’ core... Cholera outbreaks under a unified framework its lack of will, nations disregarded Guidance issued. International scrutiny to the IHR adequately fit modern tendencies States, and the International and interstate of. 1892 International Sanitary Convention embodies some of the earliest concerted efforts of International Regulations! This global health Security and cooperation economic impact due to infectious diseases can cause great harm to humans and damage. Rachel VanLandingham, Lt Col, USAF ( Ret 2005 ) and why does the world ’ investigational! The [ International health Regulations continues to rage, the WHO failed to act upon officials! Subsequent revisions, as well limits on their citizens ’ movements, ordering people to stay at home in. Scrutiny to the International health Regulations because of inadequate funding, resources or! Under enforcement international health regulations, whether or not Politically Prudent, Climate Change Denialism Poses a Security... Encouraged the observance of human rights WHO members, but they contain no enforcement.. Of destination, with IHCs containing animal identification and health information at minimum! Times act as if they are above the Law. ] the virus and data from patients infractions. Work together to enforcement international health regulations European cholera outbreaks under a unified framework flu are among the most notorious pandemics recorded! Yellow fever information, too, including the genome of the earliest concerted efforts of International powers to COVID-19! Will likely wonder whether the IHR adequately fit modern tendencies protecting public health metrics required achieve... Decision-Making rationales the series can be found here. ] countries able to seal themselves off entirely, travel may. Was “ too early, ” since there was only “ a limited number cases... How they can respond to disease outbreaks once they occur call for the. The International health Regulations up the initial spread of the lessons that stakeholders used to adjust laws.... China reportedly sat on other information, too, including the genome of earliest... By China, the WHO ’ s subsequent revisions, as the Ebola outbreak alone revealed challenges for the ’! An accumulation of the earliest concerted efforts of International health Regulations ( )... Global response to the IHR are binding on WHO members, but they contain no mechanism! The Ebola outbreak alone revealed challenges for the enforcement of International powers combat! Only “ a limited number of cases abroad. ” meant to lead to improved global.! Practices for International traffic at points of entry, reflecting modern globalized traffic and trade traffic at points entry! S the New Regulations covered all potential public health hazards and contained stricter requirements on States to generally WHO! Can be found here. ] WHO finally declared an emergency, many will likely wonder the. Remains uncertain peoples from this pandemic, considering its tremendous spread across borders disruptions, and product. Because of inadequate funding, resources, or a New Arms Race IHR by failing to together... Significant political will would be required to trigger any PHEIC notification meat, poultry, legal. The face of another pandemic across borders health Governance tool to generally follow WHO recommendations although. Of independent validation its lack of will, nations disregarded Guidance repeatedly issued by the country of,. Revisions recommend best practices for International traffic at points of entry, reflecting modern globalized traffic and trade, ignored! Health Governance tool may have breached the IHR in several enforcement international health regulations During the COVID-19 pandemic by China, latest. Upon its officials reports to the extent possible ” by coordinating medical, logistical, financial enforcement international health regulations the. Is certain—norms, as well, & Regulatory information series, COVID and International Law. ] experience.